Did quotas in elite eastern establishment universities in the 20th century shape American culture and intellectual life, especially politics and political economy?
Did limiting the number of Jews then (and perhaps Asians now), mean that those most likely to be allowed in for a limited number of slots available to their ethnic group at eastern establishment schools were slightly better connected, well healed, or assimilated (and therefore more likely to defend establishment corporate statist/crony capitalist/corporate socialist perspectives*), while the more working class/small business family, freshly immigrated, socially awkward, Jews (then, Asians now etc.) who were kept out of establishment universities by quotas ended up at elite schools without quotas (paradigmatically the University of Chicago) and were also more likely to be critical of establishment views, either from a libertarian or a more radical socialist, perspective?
* Paul Krugman, Jonathan Chait, The New Republic, ad nauseum.
That is, Allison Portchnik:
The Insomniac Libertarian 